Thanks for all of the sharing, commenting and responding! Another milestone passed.

For a reminder why we are so necessary, read this… Not some extreme fringe group, but official university policy!

https://www.ed.ac.uk/equality-diversity/students/educateyourself/what-does-being-trans-and-or-non-binary-mean-new/what-is-transphobia?fbclid=IwAR3plBjBwPxhvap9DM4CQ0ln4pENHpBKh8UAYogclW3t7WjpNYzTpp6puIA

Dear Mr Swinney,

Can you point out the flaw in this argument?

1) John Swinney commends sex education resources that encourage pupils to “have fun” with porn because it is “great.”
2) This will lead to more porn use as pupils’ moral inhibitions (natural and taught outside school) are thus undermined.
3) More porn use will result in more boys/men reaching the stage where more conventional porn no longer stimulates adequately.
4) This will lead to more exploration of different genres of pornography (as Swinney’s’ lessons recommend).
5) Users will become desensitised to these new forms of pornography as well, so some will seek more extreme and transgressive forms. Including child pornography.
6) This can lead to the development of sexual attraction to children.
7) This often leads to child abuse.
8) Therefore, John Swinney’s actions will increase the incidence of child abuse in the future.
9) A person acting in a way that will increase the prevalence of a phenomenon can be said to be fueling it.
10) Therefore, John Swinney fuels child abuse.

For the full story on Swinney’s sex education, you can read this:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y-CanH4wVorArpLx6dQ-QmMAosKvw4ZF/view?usp=sharing